In Bengaluru, the leader of the Congress, M Mallikarjun Kharge, articulated a demand for a specialized inquiry into the electoral bonds program. He emphasized freezing the bank accounts of the BJP until the investigation’s conclusion, citing the party’s accumulation of Rs 6,060 crore over five years through this scheme. Kharge also highlighted the timing of several companies purchasing electoral bonds shortly after facing scrutiny from central agencies like the Enforcement Directorate and Income Tax Department.
While the BJP amassed significant sums through electoral bonds, Kharge noted the freezing of the Congress’s bank account despite receiving donations. He referenced the Prime Minister’s slogan of abstaining from corruption, juxtaposing it with revelations from the Supreme Court regarding the BJP’s financial gains from electoral bonds. SBI data purportedly indicates a stark contrast in donation percentages between the BJP and Congress, with the former receiving 50 percent and the latter only 11 percent.
Addressing reporters, Kharge scrutinized the disproportionate donation influx, given the Congress’s sizeable voter base compared to the BJP. He questioned the sources of such substantial contributions from capitalist entities and other companies, insinuating potential impropriety.
Kharge further criticized the utilization of central enforcement agencies by the government, suggesting coercion tactics to secure donations. He posited that individuals embroiled in legal disputes with these agencies might feel pressured to contribute to the ruling party.
Highlighting the impediments faced by the Congress due to frozen bank accounts, Kharge underscored the disparity in funding sources between the two major parties. He lamented the inability to operate accounts while alleging preferential treatment for the BJP.
Expressing concerns over the electoral fairness, Kharge called for a comprehensive investigation into the BJP’s finances and their potential quid pro quo relationships. He accused the BJP of offering party positions to individuals targeted by enforcement agencies, insinuating a pattern of undue influence and favoritism.