The clash between India and Australia in the first match of the T20 series set pulses racing. Chasing a massive target of 209 runs, Team India found themselves needing just two runs off four balls. However, the game took a sudden turn with three wickets falling back to back, intensifying the standoff. At the crucial last ball, India required a single run to seal victory. Rinku Singh faced Sean Abbott’s delivery and smashed a spectacular six. The umpire signaled, presenting cricket enthusiasts with a fascinating rule encounter.

Despite India’s confirmed victory after the umpire’s signal, Rinku Singh’s six got nullified. This happened because Sean Abbott’s delivery was deemed a no-ball. In cricket, a six counts even on a no-ball, raising the question: why was Rinku Singh’s six not acknowledged? This puzzling query lingered in the minds of cricket fans. Here, we present a simple answer to this question.

In actuality, when Rinku Singh struck the six on the final ball, Team India required only a single run for victory. As Sean Abbott’s ball was a no-ball, India had already received an additional run before the delivery. Essentially, the Indian team had clinched the win. Consequently, the significance of the six diminished. This pivotal reason led to the dismissal of the last ball and shot of the match. Yes, if India had needed two runs to win, Rinku Singh’s finishing six would have surely been counted.

Surya’s innings overshadowed England’s century

Australia set a formidable total of 208 runs, courtesy of Josh Inglis’ rapid 110 runs off 50 balls. In response, India, led by Suryakumar Yadav’s explosive 82 off 40 balls, secured the target with just one ball remaining. Additionally, Ishan Kishan’s vital innings of 58 off 39 balls added to India’s commanding performance. The match was intense, captivating fans worldwide.