New Delhi: The Supreme Courtroom on Thursday heard the case of Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s aide Bibhav Kumar. Throughout this, the courtroom reprimanded the state authorities. The courtroom questioned whether or not such a goon ought to work within the CM’s home. Allow us to inform you that earlier this yr, AAP MP Swati Maliwal had allegedly attacked the residence of Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal.
A bench of Justices Suryakant, Dipankar Dutta and Ujjwal Bhuiyan has adjourned the listening to on Kumar’s bail plea to subsequent Wednesday. The courtroom instructed senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi that the courtroom is shocked by the main points of the incident recorded by the Delhi Excessive Courtroom.
Kumar has challenged the July 12 order of the Delhi Excessive Courtroom denying him bail within the case. He has claimed that the allegations in opposition to him are false. He has additionally stated that his custody is not required because the investigation is full. The apex courtroom has issued a discover to the Delhi authorities on his petition.
The bench requested Singhvi whether or not the CM residence is a non-public bungalow? Ought to such ‘goons’ work within the CM residence? Singhvi stated the accidents sustained by Swati Maliwal weren’t severe and the FIR within the case was registered three days after the incident on Could 13.
In its sharp remarks, the bench additionally requested Singhvi what AAP Rajya Sabha MP Maliwal indicated by calling the police helpline through the assault incident. The bench stated we grant bail to contract killers, murderers, robbers each day, however the query is what sort of incident passed off. The bench stated it’s upset with the way in which the incident passed off. The bench stated he (Vibhav Kumar) behaved as if a ‘goon’ had entered the CM’s official residence.
